1956 BMW 502 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1956 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW 502.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 BMW 502 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | BMW | Toyota |
| Model | 502 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 45 L |
