1956 BMW 502 vs. 2007 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2007 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chevrolet HHR (175 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1956 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW 502.
Because 1956 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Chevrolet HHR has automatic transmission and 1956 BMW 502 has manual transmission. 1956 BMW 502 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Chevrolet HHR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 BMW 502 | 2007 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 502 | HHR |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 2397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2630 mm |
