1956 BMW 502 vs. 2008 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 BMW 502 weights approximately 66 kg more than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1956 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 BMW 502 | 2008 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | BMW | Fiat |
Model | 502 | Bravo |
Year Released | 1956 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1368 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 58 L |