1956 BMW 502 vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (141 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1956 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1956 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 BMW 502 | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 502 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1866 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |