1956 BMW 502 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1956 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 468 kg more than 1956 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 BMW 502 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 502 | XJ |
Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1884 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5127 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3032 mm |