1956 BMW Isetta vs. 1963 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1963 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP) has 184 more horse power than 1956 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1765 kg more than 1956 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 BMW Isetta | 1963 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Isetta | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 247 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | single | V |
| Horse Power | 13 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 1 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 360 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 3300 mm |
