1956 BMW Isetta vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1956 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six weights approximately 438 kg more than 1956 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 BMW Isetta | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | BMW | Reliant |
| Model | Isetta | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 247 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | single | in-line |
| Horse Power | 13 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 1 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 360 kg | 798 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2290 mm |
