1956 BMW Isetta vs. 1995 Renault Clio
To start off, 1995 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 1,171 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Renault Clio (59 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1956 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Renault Clio weights approximately 495 kg more than 1956 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 BMW Isetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 BMW Isetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 BMW Isetta | 1995 Renault Clio | |
| Make | BMW | Renault |
| Model | Isetta | Clio |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 247 cc | 1171 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | single | in-line |
| Horse Power | 13 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 1 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 360 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2680 mm |
