1956 BMW Isetta vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Clio (64 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1956 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 520 kg more than 1956 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 BMW Isetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 BMW Isetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 BMW Isetta | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | Isetta | Clio |
Year Released | 1956 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 247 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | single | in-line |
Horse Power | 13 HP | 64 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 85 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 1 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 360 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2470 mm |