1956 BMW Isetta vs. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP) has 84 more horse power than 1956 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW Isetta.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 BMW Isetta | 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | Isetta | Tracker |
Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 247 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | single | in-line |
Horse Power | 13 HP | 97 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2210 mm |