1956 BMW Isetta vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 1214 kg more than 1956 BMW Isetta.
Because 1956 BMW Isetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 BMW Isetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 1956 BMW Isetta has manual transmission. 1956 BMW Isetta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 BMW Isetta | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | BMW | Mercury |
| Model | Isetta | Sable |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 247 cc | 3001 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | single | V |
| Horse Power | 13 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 1 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 360 kg | 1574 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2760 mm |
