1956 BMW Isetta vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP) has 239 more horse power than 1956 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 1275 kg more than 1956 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 BMW Isetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 BMW Isetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 BMW Isetta | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Isetta | BLS |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 247 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | single | V |
Horse Power | 13 HP | 252 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 1 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 360 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2680 mm |