1956 BMW Isetta vs. 2009 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (172 HP) has 159 more horse power than 1956 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW Isetta.
Because 1956 BMW Isetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 BMW Isetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Chevrolet HHR has automatic transmission and 1956 BMW Isetta has manual transmission. 1956 BMW Isetta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet HHR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 BMW Isetta | 2009 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | Isetta | HHR |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 247 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | single | in-line |
| Horse Power | 13 HP | 172 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 1 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2640 mm |
