1956 BMW Isetta vs. 2010 Buick LaCrosse
To start off, 2010 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Buick LaCrosse (182 HP) has 169 more horse power than 1956 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW Isetta.
Because 1956 BMW Isetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 BMW Isetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Buick LaCrosse has automatic transmission and 1956 BMW Isetta has manual transmission. 1956 BMW Isetta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Buick LaCrosse will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 BMW Isetta | 2010 Buick LaCrosse | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | Isetta | LaCrosse |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 247 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | single | in-line |
Horse Power | 13 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 1 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 5001 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1857 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2837 mm |