1956 BMW Isetta vs. 2013 Kia Forte
To start off, 2013 Kia Forte is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia Forte (171 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1956 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Kia Forte weights approximately 979 kg more than 1956 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 BMW Isetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 BMW Isetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Kia Forte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 BMW Isetta | 2013 Kia Forte | |
| Make | BMW | Kia |
| Model | Isetta | Forte |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 247 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | single | in-line |
| Horse Power | 13 HP | 171 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 1 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 360 kg | 1339 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1775 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2650 mm |
