1956 Bristol 405 vs. 1983 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1983 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Bristol 405. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Bristol 405 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Bristol 405 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1983 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 1956 Bristol 405 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Bristol 405. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Bristol 405 | 1983 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Bristol | Plymouth |
Model | 405 | Reliant |
Year Released | 1956 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2260 mm |