1956 Bristol 405 vs. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Bristol 405. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Bristol 405 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Bristol 405 (101 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Bristol 405 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Bristol 405. (152 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Bristol 405.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Bristol 405 | 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 405 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1956 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2580 mm |