1956 Bugatti Type 101 vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1964 Lotus Elan is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Bugatti Type 101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Bugatti Type 101 would be higher. At 3,257 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Bugatti Type 101 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Bugatti Type 101 (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Bugatti Type 101 should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Bugatti Type 101 | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Bugatti | Lotus |
| Model | Type 101 | Elan |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3257 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2140 mm |
