1956 Buick 40 vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 1968 Jaguar E Type is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1968 Jaguar E Type. (226 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1968 Jaguar E Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Buick 40 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1968 Jaguar E Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Buick 40 | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
Make | Buick | Jaguar |
Model | 40 | E Type |
Year Released | 1956 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 106 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2450 mm |