1956 Buick 40 vs. 1979 Kia Brisa
To start off, 1979 Kia Brisa is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1979 Kia Brisa. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1979 Kia Brisa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Buick 40 weights approximately 798 kg more than 1979 Kia Brisa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Buick 40 (462 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 394 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Kia Brisa. (68 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1956 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Kia Brisa.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Buick 40 | 1979 Kia Brisa | |
Make | Buick | Kia |
Model | 40 | Brisa |
Year Released | 1956 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 462 Nm | 68 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 792 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2270 mm |