1956 Buick 40 vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 1989 Mazda 323 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Buick 40 weights approximately 720 kg more than 1989 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Buick 40 (462 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 361 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1956 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Buick 40 | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | 323 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 462 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1680 mm |