1956 Buick 40 vs. 1990 Maserati Royale
To start off, 1990 Maserati Royale is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Maserati Royale (296 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1956 Buick 40. (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Maserati Royale should accelerate faster than 1956 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Maserati Royale weights approximately 350 kg more than 1956 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Buick 40 | 1990 Maserati Royale | |
Make | Buick | Maserati |
Model | 40 | Royale |
Year Released | 1956 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 4930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1940 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2810 mm |