1956 Buick 40 vs. 1994 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 1994 Jaguar XJS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1956 Buick 40. (217 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1956 Buick 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Buick 40 | 1994 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Buick | Jaguar |
Model | 40 | XJS |
Year Released | 1956 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 222 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2600 mm |