1956 Buick 40 vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 1998 Acura CL is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (252 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1998 Acura CL. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Buick 40 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1998 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Buick 40 | 1998 Acura CL | |
| Make | Buick | Acura |
| Model | 40 | CL |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5279 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 150 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1781 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2715 mm |
