1956 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Ascari Ecosse
To start off, 2000 Ascari Ecosse is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ascari Ecosse (395 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1956 Buick 40. (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ascari Ecosse should accelerate faster than 1956 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Buick 40 weights approximately 342 kg more than 2000 Ascari Ecosse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ascari Ecosse (678 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Buick 40. (462 Nm). This means 2000 Ascari Ecosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Buick 40 | 2000 Ascari Ecosse | |
Make | Buick | Ascari |
Model | 40 | Ecosse |
Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 4722 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 395 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 462 Nm | 678 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 91.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 88.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1248 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1840 mm |