1956 Buick 40 vs. 2000 SsangYong Rexton

To start off, 2000 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2000 SsangYong Rexton. (209 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 SsangYong Rexton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 310 kg more than 1956 Buick 40.

Because 2000 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Buick 40 (462 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 SsangYong Rexton. (318 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1956 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 SsangYong Rexton.

Compare all specifications:

1956 Buick 40 2000 SsangYong Rexton
Make Buick SsangYong
Model 40 Rexton
Year Released 1956 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5279 cc 3199 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 252 HP 209 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 462 Nm 318 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 89.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.4 mm 84 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1590 kg 1900 kg
Vehicle Width 1950 mm 1880 mm
Wheelbase Size 3110 mm 2830 mm