1956 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (190 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Buick 40 weights approximately 45 kg more than 2000 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1956 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Buick 40 (462 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Celica. (177 Nm). This means 1956 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Celica.

Compare all specifications: