1956 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (217 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Buick 40 weights approximately 94 kg more than 2000 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Buick 40. (433 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Buick 40 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | 40 | Celica |
Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 433 Nm | 622 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1704 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2440 mm |