1956 Buick 40 vs. 2001 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2001 Skoda Fabia is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2001 Skoda Fabia. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2001 Skoda Fabia.
Because 1956 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Buick 40 (462 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Skoda Fabia. (310 Nm). This means 1956 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Skoda Fabia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Buick 40 | 2001 Skoda Fabia | |
| Make | Buick | Skoda |
| Model | 40 | Fabia |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5279 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 462 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2470 mm |
