1956 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Audi A6
To start off, 2002 Audi A6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2002 Audi A6. (217 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi A6 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1956 Buick 40.
Because 2002 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Buick 40 (462 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi A6. (330 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1956 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Buick 40 | 2002 Audi A6 | |
Make | Buick | Audi |
Model | 40 | A6 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 2976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 462 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 82.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 92.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1645 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2660 mm |