1956 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Dodge Viper

To start off, 2002 Dodge Viper is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Viper (460 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1956 Buick 40. (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1956 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Viper weights approximately 267 kg more than 1956 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Viper (678 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Buick 40. (462 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Buick 40.

Compare all specifications: