1956 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Jaguar XK8
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XK8 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1956 Buick 40. (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 1956 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XK8 weights approximately 144 kg more than 1956 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Buick 40 (462 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jaguar XK8. (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1956 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jaguar XK8.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Buick 40 | 2002 Jaguar XK8 | |
Make | Buick | Jaguar |
Model | 40 | XK8 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 462 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1734 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2600 mm |