1956 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Chevrolet SS
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SS (430 HP) has 178 more horse power than 1956 Buick 40. (252 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SS should accelerate faster than 1956 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet SS weights approximately 70 kg more than 1956 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet SS (583 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Buick 40. (462 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Buick 40 | 2003 Chevrolet SS | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | 40 | SS |
Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 430 HP |
Torque | 462 Nm | 583 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3080 mm |