1956 Buick 40 vs. 2004 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2004 Mahindra CL is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 2004 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Buick 40 weights approximately 290 kg more than 2004 Mahindra CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Buick 40 (462 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1956 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Buick 40 | 2004 Mahindra CL | |
Make | Buick | Mahindra |
Model | 40 | CL |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 2522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 462 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2040 mm |