1956 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Dodge Dakota

To start off, 2005 Dodge Dakota is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2005 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2005 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 247 kg more than 1956 Buick 40.

Let's talk about torque, 1956 Buick 40 (462 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Dodge Dakota. (320 Nm). This means 1956 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Dodge Dakota.

Compare all specifications:

1956 Buick 40 2005 Dodge Dakota
Make Buick Dodge
Model 40 Dakota
Year Released 1956 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5279 cc 3704 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 252 HP 210 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 462 Nm 320 Nm
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.4 mm 91 mm
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1590 kg 1837 kg
Vehicle Width 1950 mm 1830 mm
Wheelbase Size 3110 mm 3340 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]