1956 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Buick 40 weights approximately 624 kg more than 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Buick 40 | 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Buick | Mitsubishi |
Model | 40 | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1704 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2550 mm |