1956 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (310 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1956 Buick 40. (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1956 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Ram weights approximately 728 kg more than 1956 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Buick 40 (462 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Dodge Ram. (447 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 1956 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Buick 40 | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Buick | Dodge |
Model | 40 | Ram |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 462 Nm | 447 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 2318 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2017 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3569 mm |