1956 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 5008. (161 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 5008.
Because 1956 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 5008, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Buick 40 (462 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 5008. (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1956 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 5008.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Buick 40 | 2010 Peugeot 5008 | |
Make | Buick | Peugeot |
Model | 40 | 5008 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 462 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1835 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2735 mm |