1956 Buick 40 vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 168 more horse power than 1956 Buick 40. (252 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1956 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi R8 weights approximately 45 kg more than 1956 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Buick 40 (462 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi R8. (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1956 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi R8.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Buick 40 | 2012 Audi R8 | |
Make | Buick | Audi |
Model | 40 | R8 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 420 HP |
Torque | 462 Nm | 430 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2649 mm |