1956 Cadillac 6239D vs. 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac 6239D would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 90 kg more than 1956 Cadillac 6239D.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Cadillac 6239D | 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 6239D | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5972 cc | 6229 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 109 L |
