1956 Cadillac 6239D vs. 1969 ZIL 114
To start off, 1969 ZIL 114 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac 6239D would be higher. At 7,962 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Cadillac 6239D (285 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1969 ZIL 114. (254 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Cadillac 6239D should accelerate faster than 1969 ZIL 114. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 ZIL 114 weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1956 Cadillac 6239D.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 ZIL 114 (580 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Cadillac 6239D. (543 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1969 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Cadillac 6239D.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Cadillac 6239D | 1969 ZIL 114 | |
Make | Cadillac | ZIL |
Model | 6239D | 114 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5972 cc | 7962 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 254 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 543 Nm | 580 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 3175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 3770 mm |