1956 Cadillac 6239D vs. 1980 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1980 Lancia Beta is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac 6239D would be higher. At 5,972 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Cadillac 6239D is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Cadillac 6239D weights approximately 950 kg more than 1980 Lancia Beta.
Because 1956 Cadillac 6239D is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Cadillac 6239D. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Lancia Beta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1956 Cadillac 6239D has automatic transmission and 1980 Lancia Beta has manual transmission. 1980 Lancia Beta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1956 Cadillac 6239D will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Cadillac 6239D | 1980 Lancia Beta | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
| Model | 6239D | Beta |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5972 cc | 1585 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 51 L |
