1956 Cadillac 6239D vs. 1982 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1982 Jaguar XJR is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac 6239D would be higher. At 5,972 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Cadillac 6239D is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Cadillac 6239D weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1982 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Cadillac 6239D | 1982 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | 6239D | XJR |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5972 cc | 5343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 90 L |
