1956 Cadillac 6239D vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 1994 Mazda 626 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac 6239D would be higher. At 5,972 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Cadillac 6239D is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Cadillac 6239D (285 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 626. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Cadillac 6239D should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Cadillac 6239D weights approximately 798 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Cadillac 6239D (543 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1956 Cadillac 6239D will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Cadillac 6239D | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 6239D | 626 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5972 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 543 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.1 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1212 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |
