1956 Cadillac 6239D vs. 2000 Saleen S7
To start off, 2000 Saleen S7 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac 6239D would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Saleen S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Saleen S7 (550 HP) has 265 more horse power than 1956 Cadillac 6239D. (285 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Saleen S7 should accelerate faster than 1956 Cadillac 6239D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Cadillac 6239D weights approximately 763 kg more than 2000 Saleen S7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1956 Cadillac 6239D has automatic transmission and 2000 Saleen S7 has manual transmission. 2000 Saleen S7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1956 Cadillac 6239D will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Cadillac 6239D | 2000 Saleen S7 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Saleen |
| Model | 6239D | S7 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5972 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 550 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1247 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4755 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1981 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1041 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2692 mm |
