1956 Cadillac 6239D vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac 6239D would be higher. At 5,972 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Cadillac 6239D is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Cadillac 6239D (285 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (222 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Cadillac 6239D should accelerate faster than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Cadillac 6239D (543 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (407 Nm). This means 1956 Cadillac 6239D will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Cadillac 6239D | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 6239D | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1956 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5972 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 222 HP |
Torque | 543 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2550 mm |