1956 Cadillac 6239D vs. 2002 Eagle Vision
To start off, 2002 Eagle Vision is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac 6239D would be higher. At 5,972 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Cadillac 6239D is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Cadillac 6239D (285 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2002 Eagle Vision. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Cadillac 6239D should accelerate faster than 2002 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Cadillac 6239D weights approximately 440 kg more than 2002 Eagle Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Cadillac 6239D is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Cadillac 6239D. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Cadillac 6239D | 2002 Eagle Vision | |
Make | Cadillac | Eagle |
Model | 6239D | Vision |
Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5972 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |