1956 Cadillac 6239D vs. 2011 Volvo S80
To start off, 2011 Volvo S80 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac 6239D would be higher. At 5,972 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Cadillac 6239D is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Cadillac 6239D weights approximately 401 kg more than 2011 Volvo S80.
Because 1956 Cadillac 6239D is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Cadillac 6239D. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Cadillac 6239D (543 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Volvo S80. (240 Nm). This means 1956 Cadillac 6239D will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Volvo S80.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Cadillac 6239D | 2011 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 6239D | S80 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5972 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 543 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 67 L |