1956 Cadillac 6239D vs. 2013 Ford Taurus

To start off, 2013 Ford Taurus is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac 6239D would be higher. At 5,972 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Cadillac 6239D is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Cadillac 6239D (285 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2013 Ford Taurus. (284 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Cadillac 6239D should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Cadillac 6239D weights approximately 176 kg more than 2013 Ford Taurus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1956 Cadillac 6239D is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Cadillac 6239D. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Cadillac 6239D (543 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford Taurus. (344 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1956 Cadillac 6239D will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford Taurus.

Compare all specifications:

1956 Cadillac 6239D 2013 Ford Taurus
Make Cadillac Ford
Model 6239D Taurus
Year Released 1956 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5972 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 285 HP 284 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 543 Nm 344 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92.1 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.7:1 10.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2010 kg 1834 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 5154 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 2177 mm
Vehicle Height 1520 mm 1542 mm
Wheelbase Size 3280 mm 2868 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 75 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]