1956 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Cadillac Eldorado (185 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1175 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Cadillac Eldorado | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Eldorado | Colt |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1498 cc |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2360 mm |
